Canadian Biomass - November/December 2017

Final Thoughts

Jeff Passmore 2017-12-04 03:23:38

Ottawa needs to grasp our bioeconomy potential

In July of 2016, in an article published in Policy Options, I wrote:“One day soon, our children will be pulling bio-based products off the shelves without even thinking about it. But transitioning to the bioeconomy will take a coherent effort over 20 years. If Canada wants to stay competitive with its neighbours, we had better get started.”

Fifteen months later, are we further ahead? Well, maybe a little. On Sept. 15 the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM) agreed, as the press release says,“to address the future forest bio-economy.”

The council, chaired by Natural Resources Canada Minister Jim Carr “unanimously endorsed a Forest Bioeconomy Framework for Canada.” The release goes on. “The Framework outlines a bold new vision for the future of the forest sector and the role for biomass in the transition to a low-carbon, sustainable economy.”

The good news is that this topic made it onto the ministers’ agenda and was adopted; this sends a strong signal. It has taken many years of hard persuasion by industry to get federal, provincial and territorial governments to appreciate the extent of Canada’s biomass resource, and the degree to which this can be the source of wealth creation and jobs in the emerging bio-based economy.

Less encouraging is the part that says this “is a non-binding commitment among CCFM partners and specific pathways may be endorsed, adopted and mobilized by jurisdictions accordingly.”

Clearly the forest and general bioeconomy industries still have lots of hard persuasion ahead. We need to guide all levels of government toward more firm commitments that take advantage of Canada’s vast biomass resource, and to, as the release says, “help spur innovation, investment, research, and partnerships.”

But how are we to measure ourselves against others, and is the CCFM resolution an important milestone in creating a national bioeconomy framework for Canada?

The OECD’s (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Bioeconomy to 2030 report estimates that by 2025-30, the world’s bioeconomy market will be worth between US$2.6 and $5.8 trillion. Already within the EU the bioeconomy is generating 18 million jobs and 2.1 trillion in annual investment.

Germany leads the way with 2015 investments of 343 billion, followed by France at 295 billion and Italy at 244 billion. And the EU is investing 3.7 billion to bring bio-based products to market and ensure that Europe remains competitive in the global bioeconomy race.

Meanwhile, the Americans have been supporting biorefineries for over a decade. The U.S. departments of energy and agriculture regularly release their Federal Activities Report on the Bioeconomy which outlines a vision for the U. S. bioeconomy including “sustainably expanding the production of biomass-based fuels, power and products,” with a view to enhancing the country’s overall competitiveness.

Today, Canada has a progressive federal government with a low-carbon economy agenda. But the bio sector is up against well-connected, established, incumbent industries. For the sector to flourish, governments need to establish a strong enabling environment that is in place for the long term.

A central question for Canada is whether we can be part of creating this multi-trillion dollar industry, or whether we will simply import products and materials as other countries make them.

While there are a number of Canadian federal and provincial financial assistance programs that can reduce the financial exposure of the private sector, these are insufficient to stand up to Canadian firms that will be competitive on the international stage.

For us to compete we need to think big, take risk, have courage, act fast, be sustainable, and go global.

To help launch the bioeconomy, the federal government should consider a “first commercial project” loan guarantee program (as exists in the U.S.), a national Green Bank to facilitate private investment and provide low-cost debt, an expansion of Sustainable Development Technology Canada’s mandate and budget to encourage both domestic and foreign direct investment in bio-based projects, and tax treatment similar to what fossil and mining companies enjoy.

And it is not going to take millions, it is going to take billions. New economic opportunities like this don’t come along every decade – we need to grasp them while we can. So let’s get focussed.

©Annex Biomass_CFI_OF. View All Articles.

Final Thoughts
https://magazine.canadianbiomassmagazine.ca/article/Final+Thoughts/2953995/458689/article.html

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Advertisers

Issue List

Summer 2025

Spring 2025

Winter 2025

Fall 2024

Summer 2024

Spring 2024

Winter 2024

Fall 2023

Summer 2023

Spring 2023

Winter 2023

Fall 2022

Summer 2022

Spring 2022

Winter 2022

Fall 2021

Summer 2021

Spring 2021

Winter 2021

Fall 2020

Summer 2020

Spring 2020

Winter 2020

Fall 2019

Summer 2019

Spring 2019

Winter 2019

September-October 2018

JulyAugust 2018

MayJune 2018

March April 2018

January-February 2018

November/December 2017

September/October 2017

July/August 2017

May-June 2017

March-April 2017

January February 2017

November December 2016

October 2016

July August 2016

June 2016

March April 2016

January February 2016

November/December 2015

September/October 2015

July August 2015

May-June 2015

March-April 2015

January-February 2015

November - December 2014

September October 2014

Intersaw Guide 2014

July August 2014

May June 2014

March/April 2014

January/February 2014

November/December 2013

September/October 2013

August/September 2013

May/June 2013

March/April 2013

January/February 2013

November/December 2012

September/October 2012

July/August 2012

May/June 2012

March/April 2012

January/February 2012

November/December 2011

September/October 2011

July/August 2011

May/June 2011

April 2011

January/February 2011

November/December 2010

September/October 2010

July/August 2010

May/June 2010

March/April 2010

January/February 2010

November/December 2009

September/October 2009

August 2009

June 2009

March 2009

December 2008

August 08


Library